About Me

Name:InchDeep
Location: Colorado Springs, CO
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Archives

Blog Search

Blog Roll

 
SiteMeter

It Took 20 Years And A Presidential Campaign For Obama To Distance Himself From Racist Pastor.

Obama sends Wright to the back of the Campaign bus. From FOX News.

Obama: I Am ‘Outraged’ and ‘Angered’ By Wright’s Comments


Barack Obama appeared to disown his former pastor Tuesday, saying he was “outraged” and “angered” by Rev. Jeremiah Wright Jr.’s appearance the day before at The National Press Club.

In a press conference in North Carolina, the Illinois senator used his strongest language to date to denounce Wright’s controversial sermons and his public remarks since those sermons became national news a month ago.

“Yesterday we saw a very different vision of America,” Obama said. “I am outraged by the comments that were made, and saddened over the spectacle that we saw yesterday.”

“The person I saw yesterday was not the person that I met 20 years ago. His comments were not only divisive and destructive but I believe they ended up giving comfort to those who prey on hate,” he said.


Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

It Takes Twelve Paragraphs.

The title of an article from TheNews.com is  Palestinian ‘traitor’ sentenced to death by firing squad. But, notice is takes twelve paragraphs, of an anti-Israel screed, before we hear about the hero who helped Israel eliminate terrorists. Terrorist who hide behind there women and children to boot.

Israel kills mother, four children in Gaza raid

Tuesday, April 29, 2008
The massacre is part of Israel’s attempts to destroy any regional or international effort to lift the siege and end violence: Haniyeh

BEIT HANUN, Gaza Strip: Four children, aged one to five, their mother and an activist were killed in Israeli operations in Gaza on Monday as Palestinian factions headed to Egypt for talks on a possible truce.

The four siblings—aged one, three, four and five—were killed when a tank shell hit their home in the town of Beit Hanun, and their mother died later of her wounds, doctors at the Kamal Radwan hospital said.

“I left the house just moments before to look for one of my children. I heard the sound of the explosion,” said 70-year-old father Ahmed Abu Maateq. “They had been eating breakfast and my wife had been holding our youngest child in her hands,” he said as he looked down at the blood, flesh and spilled milk splashed across the wreckage.

His wife and six children were in the courtyard in their pyjamas when the missile slammed into the front door of the house, he said. The remaining two children were hospitalised. “I hope to God that the same thing that happened to me happens to whoever fired that missile at my house, that what happened to my wife and children happens to his family,” Abu Maateq said, his eyes red with pain and anger.

Three Hamas fighters and another Palestinian were wounded in an air strike in northern Gaza later in the day. Israeli Defence Minister Ehud Barak vowed the military would continue to target Hamas across the Gaza Strip, and blamed the Islamists for civilian deaths.

Hamas meanwhile lashed out at Israel, saying the strike undermined talks in Egypt aimed at securing a ceasefire in Gaza. Senior Hamas leader Ismail Haniyeh said the “massacre” was part of Israel’s “constant attempts to destroy any regional or international effort to lift the siege and end the violence.”

Palestinian militants fired at least 13 rockets at southern Israel, damaging a house in the hard-hit town of Sderot near the border, the army said. No one was wounded in the attack. At least 443 people, most of them Palestinians, have been killed since the restart of formal peace talks under US auspices at an international conference in November, according to an AFP tally.

The latest clashes came as delegations from several Palestinian factions headed to Cairo to discuss a possible ceasefire with Israel after the Islamist Hamas movement which rules the Gaza Strip held similar talks in Egypt.

Egypt has been serving as a go-between in truce negotiations as Israel refuses any direct contacts with organisations it considers terror groups. Members of the Popular Resistance Committees (PRC) and three smaller leftist groups crossed into Egypt via the Rafah border crossing with Gaza on Monday.

Islamic Jihad, which has carried out numerous rocket attacks on southern Israel, planned to send a delegation from Damascus to Cairo on Monday night. Egyptian intelligence chief Omar Suleiman will host the factions on Tuesday and Wednesday in a bid to draft a common position on the truce proposal.

Meanwhile the UN Relief and Works Agency said it will resume distributing food aid to some 650,000 Palestinian refugees in Gaza on Tuesday after a four-day interruption caused by fuel shortages.

Meanwhile, a Palestinian man was sentenced to death by firing squad on Monday for collaborating with Israeli intelligence, according to the head of security services in the West Bank town of al-Khalil.

“The military court sentenced sergeant Imad Mahmud Saad, 24 ... to the firing squad after finding him guilty of treason and of transmitting information to occupation forces,” Brigadier-General Samih al-Seifi told AFP.

The information Saad gave to the Israelis “led to the death of four wanted people, the destruction of a house and the arrest of several more Palestinians,” Seifi added. The death sentence decree must now go to Palestinian president Mahmoud Abbas, who has the power to pardon the prisoner.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Ericka Anderson's Column On Human Events Asks A Good Question.

"If his former pastor doesn’t believe Barack Obama, why should voters? " The answer is they shouldn't. The country needs to kick Obamination and his pastor to the curb.

Read the Rest.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

From NRO "A Christian Farrakhan"

A "Christian Farrakhan." Wish I had thought of it.

The Rev. Jeremiah Wright has taken Barack Obama’s critically acclaimed race speech in Philadelphia, ripped it into bits, and tossed it in the air to serve as confetti for his parade through the media.

In that speech, Obama said Wright had been taken out of context, a defense the pastor has made himself. If only we knew the true Wright, Obama complained, instead of just “the snippets of those sermons that have run on an endless loop on the television and YouTube.” In his interview with Bill Moyers on PBS, Wright said the playing of his sound bites was “unfair,” “unjust” and “untrue.”

Then cometh the good reverend to step all over the out-of-context defense in a speech at the National Press Club. He defended his “chickens come home to roost” statement about 9/11 in exactly the same terms as in his original sermon: “You cannot do terrorism on other people and expect it never to come back on you.” He stood by his damnation of America and his contention that the U.S. government had created AIDS: “I believe our government is capable of doing anything.”

For good measure, he dishonestly denied Louis Farrakhan’s infamous denunciation of Judaism as a “gutter religion” and called him “one of the most important voices in the 20th and 21st century.” The more Wright talked, the more he sounded like a Christian Farrakhan.

Near the end of his majestically awful performance, he corrected reporters, telling them that Obama “did not denounce me. He distanced himself from some of my remarks.” About this at least, Wright was sober and precise. “I can no more disown him than I can disown the black community,” Obama said in Philadelphia. At the Press Club, Wright similarly insisted that the attacks on him were an attack on the “black church.”

Obama and Wright thus slander both the black community and black church. As Stanley Kurtz of the Ethics and Public Policy CenterNational Review, Trinity United Church of Christ “is arguably the most radical black church in the country.” Its black liberation theology has been rejected by mainstream black churches, a source of frustration for its adherents. This theology is at the root of all that Wright says, so the “context” is as radical as his highly publicized fulminations.

James Cone, the founder of black liberation theology, forged a worldview mingling Malcolm X-style revolutionary black nationalism and third-world Marxism with prophetic Christianity. He calls it “a theology which confronts white society as the racist anti-Christ.” In a war against “white values,” black pastors must — as Wright has — reject “white seminaries with their middle-class white ideas about God, Christ and the church.”

When Wright came to Trinity Church in Chicago in the 1970s — invited to give the worship a more black inflection and foster stronger ties to the community — the middle-class parishioners who had beckoned him left when they got a dose of his radicalism. The national United Church of Christ denomination considered distancing itself from the Wright-led church. Yet Obama came — and stayed.

In search of an identity and a community, Obama found it in Trinity, where he was converted by Wright’s signature “Audacity to Hope” sermon and its black-liberation themes of the suffering of blacks merging with that of the ancient Israelites (not to be confused with today’s condemnable Israelites). Obama can’t be begrudged his youthful initiation, but remaining at the church for two decades? Wright is a canker on his candidacy, raising questions about who he really is and about his honesty.

In a slippery dance, Obama maintains that he was thoroughly shocked by Wright’s original radioactive statements and hadn’t heard him say such things, although he did hear other (always carefully unspecified) “controversial” things. The threat to Obama as the paladin of the “new politics” is that, as he dodges and distances on Wright, people will come to agree with his former pastor’s newly dismissive evaluation: “He says what he has to say as a politician.”

© 2008  by King Features Syndicate
reports in the latest
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Young Punk "whatilearnedthisweek" Tries To Convicnce Everyone It Is The Smartest Thing In The Room.

What you do when you have no life. You post comments on InchDeep's Blog. How pathetic.

From whatilearnedthisweek

Ok...

"Mr. Obama hangs around some people whom he refuses to repudiate in a way that I find convincing."


The standard for the call for "Repudiation" is somewhat vague. What I hear from most, including yourself, is:

1. A list of the wrongful actions of Ayers, Wright and more.

2. What follows is the Senator's refusal to Repudiate those men in absolute terms, instead of a denouncement of their actions.

3. Finally, it is concluded that the Senator is of Poor Judgment, and often Character, for his failure to direct his denouncement or repudiation beyond the actions of the aforementioned.

If I clearly understood the standard for "Repudiation" and witnessed its application consistently, for all persons, I would be inclined to share your conclusion. I Do Not find the Senator's Relationship with Ayers or Wright comforting. I Will Not question the Senator's Patriotism, as its standard is equally vague....

And this, since It is so self important takes two comments to vomit his drivel.


whatilearnedthisweek writes:

Ok... (Cont)

...Let's attempt to define the standard for Repudiation... Sincerely. And from this exercise, in short order, we can apply it evenly. I will take a swing at this first.... Repudiation should be demanded & expected if:

1. An individual's actions, by design, encouragement or negligence, results in the direct physical harm of a person. This standard excludes military conflict, capital punishment & abortion ..for now.

2. An individual's actions, by design, encouragement or negligence result in the destabilization or corruption of our government.

3. An individual's actions, by design, encouragement or negligence malign or slander our religious beliefs.


Now, it must be determine to whom these criteria will be applied... How many generations back? If we determine that the noted standard will apply to persons from 1950 forward, our list of qualified Repudiates will be quite lengthy, so you decide... but remember.... The standard must be applied consistently... No bias

I can hear  you yawning. Me too.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Do You Really Need An Expert To Test This. "Court assigns expert to verify 'bulletproof' stone dealer's claim"

Dubai: A court will dispatch an expert to examine the value of an onyx stone, the owner of which is serving a six-month imprisonment for promoting it for Dh1.8 billion because it is bulletproof.

The Dubai Court of Appeal on Monday approved the assigning of an expert from Dubai police's criminal laboratory or any concerned authority to examine the confiscated onyx stone and assess its value to decide whether it contains any special characteristics which makes it bulletproof.

The Public Prosecution charged the 52-year-old Yemeni dealer with attempted swindling and trying to con people by posting a newspaper advertisement in which he promoted the bulletproof onyx stone for Dh1.8 billion.

His lawyer Saeed Al Ghailani, of Saeed Al Ghailani Advocates and Legal Consultants, earlier asked the Court of Appeal judge to assign a physics expert or Dubai police's criminal laboratory to test the stone and decide whether it contains any electromagnetic powers which diverts the bullet before it hits the stone wearer.

Al Ghailani also asked the court to acquit his client (Q.M.) and dismiss the uncorroborated evidence.

"I am willing to prove to the world that it's a bulletproof onyx stone... I am ready to face a death sentence if that's what will take me to prove that the stone is doubtlessly bulletproof... I didn't con anybody out of money, but the police tricked me and filed a malicious case against me," the accused, Q.M., told the Court of Appeal earlier.

Speaking to the judge, the Yemeni said: "I ask the court to try the stone in front of the whole world."

The Court of Misdemeanour earlier sentenced him to six months in jail followed by deportation after he was found guilty of attempted swindling.

He has denied attempted swindling and trying to con people by posting a newspaper advertisement in which he promoted the bulletproof onyx stone for Dh1.8 billion, as charged by the Public Prosecution.

During the hearing, the accused said the stone proved bulletproof when he tried it four times on sheep.

"I had a stall at Global Village where I displayed precious stones, including the onyx. I asked the police to try the stone before confiscating it and arresting me. They refused. I brought it with me from Yemen."

Gulfnews.

UPDATE:

Vendor of 'bullet-proof' stone gets bail
Mary Nammour (Staff Reporter)

28 April 2008

DUBAI - The Dubai Court of Appeal on April28 granted bail to Yemeni vendor Q.M., who was arrested during the Dubai Shopping Festival last year for trying to con people by offering to sell an onyx stone claiming it had special powers, upon depositing his passport.

Presiding Judge Mostapha Chinawi, however, turned down defence lawyer Saeed Al Ghailani's plea to assign foreign experts to test the stone.

The judge postponed the hearing to May 12 to review the report of the Dubai Municipality.

 Al Ghailani told the court that his client, Q.M., had spent almost the entire jail sentence ordered by the Court of Misdemeanour and it was time he was released.

Khaleej Times Online.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Now This Is Irony.

Chinese factory found making Tibetan flags: reports

Posted 7 hours 13 minutes ago

Reports in a Hong Kong newspaper say police in China have discovered a factory making thousands of Tibetan flags for activist groups overseas.

The Ming Pao newspaper in Hong Kong says the Tibetan flags were being made at a factory in the southern province of Guangdong.

It says the factory owner was just fulfilling an order and was not aware of the sensitivity of the flags which are outlawed by the Chinese authorities.

The case reportedly came to light because some workers at the factory recognised the distinctive snow mountain lion design on the flag from watching HK TV.

They checked the significance of the flag on the internet before alerting the authorities.

ABC News Australia.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Word Salad From Defender Of Racist Dr. Wright.

Here are comments from someone who learned nothing this week. The loons are out today. Don't defend just attack.

whatilearnedthisweek writes:

Oh Really?

"Wright said today the attacks on him are really an assault on the Black Church in America. Consequently, does that mean we can define the beliefs of the American Black Church by his statements. In such a case we would be forced to define the American Black Church as racist."

InchDeep, not quite certain of your intent, was the question and conclusion an attempt at being provocative or an example of poor & inconsistent reasoning? Your question presumes that an individual pastor is believed to be the authority of "all things Black Church", and your poorly constructed follow-up question is merely the child of its awkward parent.

If you accept the premise that a single pastor may define Christianity and The Church for all Black folk than you are well on your way to concluding anything. Your approach is symbolic of the intentionally lazy reasoning of modern Man, "Why attempt to apply clear and consistent definition and value to my beliefs when I can just speak for the pleasure of speaking?"

No man, Black or White, should be called to account for the poor behavior of another. If this were a legitimate claim, then your former English, Literature and History instructors would have too much to account for.

And more drivel.

whatilearnedthisweek writes:

InchDeep

Without insult, I do believe that your intent was clearly aligned with your effort. All efforts to dissect, what could only be described as the unfortunate collision between urban culture colloquialism and grammar 101, delivered the same conclusion, which you explicitly stated.... That others must account for Rev Wright's words.

If that wasn't your intent than there should not have been any mention of others to challenge Rev Wright.... Not a difficult point for most to grasp.

"The child of its awkward parent" is a direct reference to your Initial Point and the poorly articulated subsequent point... i.e. Weak Premise. Weaker subsequent premise.

Further... as opposed to lashing out against those who recognize an apparent "Socially Promoted" General Studies major, you might consider being well read, then one day, well written....






Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Wright Defines The Black Church???

Wright said today the attacks on him are really an assault on the Black Church in America. Consequently, does that mean we can define the beliefs of the American Black Church by his statements. In such a case we would be forced to define the American Black Church as racist. I am not ready to do that. He is a racist. He is not typical of the American Black Church. They need to come out against him, or they will in fact be defined by him. He will drive back the progress made in race relations. But, that is what he wants. If we really get by the race issue he and his ilk, Jessie Jackson and Al Sharpton, will be out of a job. They are race pimps and make their living on the backs of those who, for some unknown reason, follow them. Kick him to the curb people, he will only drag you down.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (14) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Doesn't Yelling "death to Denmark" Over The Fitna Film, Prove The Point Of The Film. YES IS DOES.

4,000 Women Rally Against Anti-Islam Film

-- Thousands of women rallied Karachi Saturday to protest against reprinting of blasphemous cartoons in some 17 Danish newspapers and an anti-Islam Dutch film, witnesses said.

The women shouted "death to Denmark and death to Netherlands," as they marched about a kilometre on a busy street. Police said up to 4,000 women, mostly from the Jamaat-e-Islami, took part in the demonstration, venting anger against the Internet release of a 15-minute film last month by far-right Dutch MP Geert Wilders and publication of the blasphemous sketches. In a resolution, the rally urged the government to cease diplomatic ties with Denmark and the Netherlands and expel their envoys.

"We will defend the honour of our Prophet (Peace be upon him) and our religion at the cost of our lives," the Jamaat-e-Islami
said. Pakistan's foreign ministry last month summoned the Dutch ambassador and lodged a "strong protest" over Wilders's film, which it said "deeply offended the sentiments of Muslims all over the world." The cartoons originally appeared in a Danish newspaper in September 2005, sparking anger and protests across the Muslim world. Five people died in Pakistan in February 2006 during violent protests against the drawings.

Iran Quran News Agency.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Kill A None Muslim In Pakistan For Blasphemy And Get Charged With??? “failure to inform the police that blasphemy was underway.”

More from the religion of peace in Pakistan.

Killed for “blasphemy”, now his family is at risk
by Qaiser Felix
The sister of Jagdeesh Kumar, a 22-year-old Hindu man killed by his co-workers who accused him of blasphemy, wants a real investigation by the government which arrested the murderers without charging them with murder. Marginalised, the family wants justice. The Church makes an appeal.

Karachi (AsiaNews) – Unless justice comes back to Pakistan it will impossible for a non Muslim to survive, said Rameshri Kumar, the older sister of Jagdeesh Kumar, a 22-year-old factory worker killed by his co-workers after being accused of blasphemy. Her outburst came in a long interview with the daily newspaper Dawn which describes the manner in which the young man met his death and the current situation of his family “hated by everyone because of false charges that have cause already a lot of sorrow.”

Sentenced to death by his fellow workers, Jagdeesh was beaten for almost half an hour on 8 April by the Muslims working in the leather factory where he worked.

Accused of defiling the name of the prophet the young man’s fellow workers arbitrarily enforced the infamous anti-blasphemy law that exists in the country which imposes the death penalty on anyone desecrating Islam or Muhammad.

Jagdeesh is the first Hindu to die as a result of the law.

The three workers who carried out the beating were arrested, charged not with murder but with “failure to inform the police that blasphemy was underway.”

“We have reason to believe that there is a cover-up,” said Ratan Kumar, a councillor from the Karachi district where the murder took place. For him that police are covering up the situation. “It’s a case of murder, not blasphemy,” he added.

Meanwhile the Kumar family is in danger. Popular attitudes towards the families of blasphemers tend towards marginalising them. Their very lives are at risk.

For another sister of the dead man, Sundri, such a situation would be impossible in the rest of the world. Her family wants neither “ compensation, nor any financial support. We need justice, which would definitely remove such an allegation from our community,” she said.

The Catholic Church asked the new government to intervene giving a “signal of change” compared to the previous administration.

“We condemn the killing of Jagdesh Kumar and demand a prompt and fair inquiry into this incident,” said the Catholic Church’s National Commission for Justice and Peace in a press release. For the Church such violations of minority rights are no longer tolerable.

Pakistan is a predominantly Muslim country. Hindus make up 1.6 per cent of the population; Catholics are around 2.2 per cent.

AsiaNews.it.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Islam Online's White Wash On Womens Rights. "No second-class Muslim women."

CAIRO — Moving around the world like any other women and practicing hobbies while observing the pillars of Islam, Muslim women are challenging Western perceptions that Muslim women are second-class citizens, trapped in their homes and hidden behind the veil.

"Women are allowed to drive, vote, attend co-educational universities and hold paying jobs," Pakistani Amina Jamal told The Star on Saturday, April 26.

"I like reading books on contemporary religion, Islam, philosophy, history, biographies, comics and poetry."

Jamal, 36, is working as a sales manager in Lahore and is leading a 14-member team, including several males.

"Half the time we are arguing about one thing or another, but it’s normally all in good spirit," she said.

"I enter the workplace on my own terms and I am grateful to Allah and my family for it. If it wasn’t for my mother’s support, I would not have been able to work nights or at odd hours."

For Nour Farouq Lambaz, Jordanian, Islam grants women equal rights with men.

"When Muslim women are oppressed, it is by their men who are not very good Muslims. So it’s not Islam," said Lambaz, archivist.

"Islam is a very fair and beautiful religion.

"It is the reason pagan Arabs became scholars at one point. It is the reason girls stopped being buried alive."

In pre-Islam ages, pagan Arabs used to kill girls as they believed they were a burden and a source of poverty and shame.

  • Equal

Sara Takieddin, musician, always thought that wearing hijab would restrict her freedom. But she changed views when she donned the Islamic headscarf.

"When I totally grasped the wisdom behind Islam’s command of wearing the hijab, I knew I couldn’t bear myself not wearing it."

Takieddin dismissed perceptions that women are treated as second-class citizens under Islam.

"In Islam, women enjoy certain privileges which men are deprived of," she said.

"The man is responsible for the complete maintenance of his wife and family. All financial burdens are borne by him alone.

"In contrast, women have no financial responsibilities whatsoever, except for her personal expenses – for instance, should she wish to own luxurious things. She is also free to retain whatever she possesses before marriage."

Tajieddin's love life also mirrors her faith in Islam.

"I wouldn’t get involved in a relationship where I’m uncertain marriage is the aim. I’d rather have my family enquire about the man to determine whether he is a good person."

  • Culture

Muslim women blamed culture and social traditions, not Islam, for some oppressive practices against women.

"Not everything Muslims do is based on religious principles. In its original state, Islam gave women privileges and didn’t impose double standards upon them, said Elham Gholami, Iranian.

Gholami, who is working as a customer service executive, said Muslim women are entitled to inheritance and allowed to choose or refuse prospective husbands.

"But in some Muslim countries, their rights have been taken away," she said.

"Pakistani women have political rights but are often exploited by men. Saudi women have no public role, yet they are extremely protected by their families and government and are offered dowries, often very high ones, and are entitled to keep their own wealth."

Jamal, the Pakistani, agrees, citing the dowries Pakistan brides have to pay to their husbands.

"In Islam, the man is supposed to be the provider of his family. Women are not obliged to go out and earn.

"Women are also employed in the armed forces, are members of National and Provincial assemblies and are made ministers. In very traditional areas though, women are dominated by men because of ignorance and illiteracy."

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

"Israel: UNIFIL is hiding information about Hezbollah from Security Council"

Ah yes the UN looking to avoid conflict hides the activities of Hezbollah terrorists. Nice.

The United Nations Interim Force in Lebanon (UNIFIL) is intentionally concealing information about Hezbollah activities south of the Litani River in Lebanon to avoid conflict with the group, senior sources in Jerusalem have said. In the last six months there have been at least four cases in which UNIFIL soldiers identified armed Hezbollah operatives, but did nothing and did not submit full reports on the incidents to the UN Security Council.

The Israel Defense Forces and the Foreign Ministry are reportedly very angry about UNIFIL's actions in recent months, especially about the fact that its commander, Major General Claudio Graziano, is said to be leniently interpreting his mission, as assigned by Security Council Resolution 1701, passed at the end of the Second Lebanon War.

Senior IDF officials said recently behind closed doors that Graziano is "presenting half-truths so as to avoid embarrassment and conflict with Hezbollah," and that Resolution 1701 has been increasingly eroded in recent months.

A senior government source in Jerusalem said that, "There is an attempt by various factors in the UN to mislead the Security Council and whitewash everything having to do with the strengthening of Hezbollah in southern Lebanon." The source also said, "The policy of cover-ups and whitewashing will not last long and, hopefully, now that the concealing of information has been revealed, things will change."

Israeli anger reached boiling point over a week ago after the release of a new report by UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon with regard to another Lebanon-related Security Council resolution, 1559. The report briefly mentioned an incident at the beginning of March in which UNIFIL soldiers encountered unidentified armed men, and included no additional details. Officials in Israel, familiar with the incident, reportedly were aware that the Security Council had not been apprised of numerous details of the incident.

A day after the release of the report, Haaretz revealed that the incident described in the report had actually been a clash between UNIFIL and armed Hezbollah activists. The latter, driving a truck full of explosives, threatened the Italian UNIFIL battalion with weapons. Instead of using force as required by their mandate, the UN soldiers abandoned the site. A diplomatic source at the UN told Haaretz that senior officials in UNIFIL and in the UN Secretariat brought heavy pressure to bear to have the incident erased from the report or at least to blur it.

When the incident was made public, UNIFIL was forced to admit that it had indeed occurred and to request Lebanon's assistance in investigating it. UNIFIL spokeswoman Yasmina Bouziane said that during the incident, which took place near the city of Tyre in southern Lebanon, five armed men had threatened UNIFIL troops. Bouziane said the identity of the armed men was uncertain.

A day later, a second report was transmitted to the Security Council on the matter, this time including all the details. However, the report stated that this was the first incident of its kind. According to a security source in Israel, this was a misrepresentation; he said that in fact there had been many similar incidents in the past. A response from UNIFIL with regard to Israel's claims was unobtainable.

Haaretz.com

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The EU Pats Itself On THe Back For Critisizing Hamas. Oh, But Only After They Slam Israel.

The EU Pats Itself On The Back For criticizing Hamas. Oh, But Only After The Slam Israel.

(IsraelNN.com) The European Union condemned Israel on Sunday for restricting the supply of fuel delivered to Hamas-controlled Gaza.  In a response to rumors of a critical fuel shortage, the EU’s message called on Israel to partially re-open Gaza crossings and resume regular deliveries of fuel.  Regular deliveries have been stopped due to frequent terrorist attacks on the crossings, but emergency fuel supplies have been let through.

The EU also condemned Hamas, saying terrorist groups in Gaza “have their share in aggravating the humanitarian situation” by their attacks on Israeli crossings, “which only lead to further suffering of the population.”  Foreign Ministry officials expressed satisfaction with the message, pointing out that the EU rarely criticizes Hamas by name.  The message shows that the EU took terrorist attacks into consideration when distributing blame for Gaza’s problems, they said.

Note, the reason Israel does anything  in Gaza is directly in response to terrorist groups from Gaza "aggravating" the situation. They need to go one farther and realize that the terrorist groups on Gaza are the only reason the situation is the area is "aggravated." What a bunch of TOOLS.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Useful Idiots In Israel: "PA Arabs, Leftist Israelis Demonstrate Against Jews in Hevron"

I am sure if you look real close you will see Sean Penn in the crowd.

(IsraelNN.com) Dozens of Palestinian Authority Arab residents of Hevron and extreme leftist Israelis marched down the main road of Hevron's Jewish neighborhood Friday afternoon just hours before the start of the Sabbath and final day of the Passover holiday. The demonstration was timed to create maximum antagonism with the city's Jewish small but tight-knit Jewish community.

The group blocked the road, preventing local Jews from entering or leaving their homes, making the last-minute preparations for the final day of the complex holiday celebration extremely difficult. Several of the marchers also attacked one local Jew, who required medical attention for the injuries he sustained as a result.

IDF soldiers informed the group, who waved Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) flags and signs praising the terrorist organization, that the event was illegal. Nevertheless the group refused to leave.

Leftists later expressed anger at local police after they arrested a demonstrator but did not arrest local Jews who threw eggshells at the demonstrators' bus.

Local Jews also expressed outrage, saying the police routinely allow extreme leftists and anarchists to disrupt Jewish life with demonstrations in Hevron.

Counterterrorism Operations Continue in Hevron Region
IDF soldiers arrested two armed PA Arab men in the Hevron region during routine counterterrorism operations and standard security measures on Saturday.

In the first incident, soldiers detained a man armed with a gun in a village northwest of Hevron. Later in the day, a PA Arab was arrested at a checkpoint in the city after he was found to be carrying a knife during a routine search.

Both men were transferred to security personnel for questioning.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous123456789Next »