About Me

Name: InchDeep
Location: Colorado Springs, CO
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Archives

Blog Search

Blog Roll

 
SiteMeter

Young Punk "whatilearnedthisweek" Tries To Convicnce Everyone It Is The Smartest Thing In The Room.

What you do when you have no life. You post comments on InchDeep's Blog. How pathetic.

From whatilearnedthisweek

Ok...

"Mr. Obama hangs around some people whom he refuses to repudiate in a way that I find convincing."


The standard for the call for "Repudiation" is somewhat vague. What I hear from most, including yourself, is:

1. A list of the wrongful actions of Ayers, Wright and more.

2. What follows is the Senator's refusal to Repudiate those men in absolute terms, instead of a denouncement of their actions.

3. Finally, it is concluded that the Senator is of Poor Judgment, and often Character, for his failure to direct his denouncement or repudiation beyond the actions of the aforementioned.

If I clearly understood the standard for "Repudiation" and witnessed its application consistently, for all persons, I would be inclined to share your conclusion. I Do Not find the Senator's Relationship with Ayers or Wright comforting. I Will Not question the Senator's Patriotism, as its standard is equally vague....

And this, since It is so self important takes two comments to vomit his drivel.


whatilearnedthisweek writes:

Ok... (Cont)

...Let's attempt to define the standard for Repudiation... Sincerely. And from this exercise, in short order, we can apply it evenly. I will take a swing at this first.... Repudiation should be demanded & expected if:

1. An individual's actions, by design, encouragement or negligence, results in the direct physical harm of a person. This standard excludes military conflict, capital punishment & abortion ..for now.

2. An individual's actions, by design, encouragement or negligence result in the destabilization or corruption of our government.

3. An individual's actions, by design, encouragement or negligence malign or slander our religious beliefs.


Now, it must be determine to whom these criteria will be applied... How many generations back? If we determine that the noted standard will apply to persons from 1950 forward, our list of qualified Repudiates will be quite lengthy, so you decide... but remember.... The standard must be applied consistently... No bias

I can hear  you yawning. Me too.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive