About Me

Name: InchDeep
Location: Colorado Springs, CO
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Archives

Blog Search

Blog Roll

 
SiteMeter

Brain Break.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Israeli President Shimon Pere Fights Back.

Peres uses UN address to brand Iran 'danger to the entire world'
By Agence France Presse (AFP)

UNITED NATIONS: Israeli President Shimon Peres on Wednesday blasted Iran, accusing the Islamic Republic of being "at the center of violence and fanaticism," during an address to the UN General Assembly. "At the center of this violence and fanaticism stands Iran," he said. "It built a danger to the entire world. Its quest for religious hegemony and regional dominance divides the Middle East and holds back chances for peace, while undermining human rights."

The Zionist state, which has occupied Arab land for more than 60 years, complains that Iran supports resistance groups.

Warning that Tehran "continues to develop enriched uranium and long-range missiles," Peres said the UN "General Assembly and the Security Council bear responsibility to prevent agonies before they take place."

Israel, which holds a monopoly on nuclear weapons in the Middle East and has the means to deliver them by aircraft, land-based missiles, and submarine-launched missiles, alleges that Iran is trying to develop atomic warheads under the guise of a civilian energy program.

The Security Council has slapped three rounds of sanctions on Iran for refusing to suspend uranium enrichment, a process which can be used to generate electricity - Iran's right as a signatory to the Non-Proliferation Treaty, which Israel has never signed - or, at far higher rates of purity, make the fissile material for a nuclear bomb. But Russia and China appear to be reluctant to impose a fourth round of sanctions.

"Tehran combines long-range missiles and short range minds. It is pregnant with tragedies," Peres said. "Their despicable denial of the Holocaust is a mockery of indisputable evidence, a cynical offense to survivors of the horror."

Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad has argued that the extent of the Nazi genocide against European Jews has been exaggerated and that, in any event, Palestinians should not be dispossessed of their land in order to compensate for the crimes of a European regime.

"Israel has shown that democracies can defend themselves. We do not intend to change," Peres warned, but added that the Iranian people "are not our enemies."

Israeli officials have repeatedly threatened to attack Iran if it does not bow to Western demands on its nuclear program - and to "destroy" the Islamic Republic if it the Zionist state comes under attack.

"Their fanatic leadership is their problem and the world's concern," Peres said. Israel's founding philosophy is based on Zionism, an ideology asserting the entitlement of Jews to land they had not inhabited for 2,000 years because God promised it to them. According to scripture, the fulfillment of that promise was to follow the return of the "Messiah," or savior.

In his own address to the Assembly Tuesday, Ahmadinejad lashed out at Israel and its chief ally the United States, saying "the Zionist regime is on a definite slope to collapse and there is no way for it to get out of the cesspool created by itself and its supporters."

Peres also accused Tehran of dividing Lebanon by supporting Hizbullah, whose fighters forced Israeli occupation forces out of most of South Lebanon in 2000, then battled the Israeli military to a virtual standstill in the 2006 war. Stymied on the ground, Israel used air power to obliterate much of Lebanon's infrastructure and kill more than 1,200 Lebanese, the great majority of them civilians.

Tehran's "support for Hamas split the Palestinians and postpones the establishment of the Palestinian state," Peres added. Israel was a key clandestine contributor to Hamas' early growth, when it saw the Islamist organization as a potential counterweight to late Palestinian President Yasser Arafat's secular Palestine Liberation Organization. - AFP, with The Daily Star

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The Answer To The Question Is Yes.

Does U.S. need legal protection from Jihad?
Chad Groening - OneNewsNow - 9/24/2008 12:30:00 PM

Islamic crescent symbol smallA Colorado Congressman has introduced legislation that would deny U.S. visas to advocates of so-called Sharia law, as well as expel Islamists already in the country.

 

Republican Tom Tancredo calls his bill the Jihad Protection Act. He has introduced the measure amid disturbing revelations that the verdicts of Islamic Sharia courts are now legally binding in the United Kingdom.    
 
Tom TancredoThe legislation, according to Tancredo, is designed to protect the United States from a similar fate.
                                  
"There are situations where we really have to look at whether or not our system can accommodate everybody, including people who are determined to overthrow us. There is no way that the Constitution of the United States and Sharia law can co-exist," Tancredo contends. "You cannot have one class of citizens -- in this case, women, for instance -- being able to be abused, battered, killed, because someone has written that that's the right way to do it in their particular religious system, and then expect the Constitution of the United States to protect everyone else's civil rights. It just simply doesn't work."
 
Tancredo says Great Britain and much of Western Europe has succumbed to the pressure for multi-culturalism, which the United States must avoid.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

"YouTube yanks video on Obama's pro-abortion stance"


Charlie Butts - OneNewsNow - 9/24/2008 7:00:00 AM

YouTubeA pro-life group is upset with YouTube for pulling a video focusing on Barack Obama's extreme abortion views.

Operation Rescue's Troy Newman worked in conjunction with Kansans Coalition for Life to develop the video entitled "Obama: WRONG Change for Children."
 
"YouTube, the bastion of free speech that allows things almost as extreme as pornography, would censor a video that exposes Barack Obama's extreme pro-abortion position," Newman explains.

 Obama pointing big
He believes YouTube is making a political statement and endorsing Obama. "There's absolutely nothing untruthful; there's nothing deceptive in this video. It tells the absolute truth," Newman contends. "[Obama] wants you to accept every radical piece of abortion legislation that's come down the pike in the past 35 years. This is out of step with mainstream America."
 
YouTube sent Newman's group a message saying the video did not meet a "Community Guideline," but that guideline was not defined. To watch the censored video, visit Operation Rescue's website.


While at the same time we have this.

Obama ads to air on Christian stations
Jim Brown - OneNewsNow - 9/24/2008 8:00:00 AM

Radio mixerA liberal political action committee called the "Matthew 25 Network" is asking Christian radio stations in the key battleground state of Ohio to air an ad that suggests Barack Obama would bring an end to the economic woes plaguing the state and the country if elected president.

 

Matthew 25 Network founder Mara Vanderslice says her group is hoping to run its latest pro-Obama ad in Cleveland, Youngstown, Cincinnati, and Columbus, as well as in smaller locales such as Findlay and Mount Vernon. Salem Radio affiliate WFHM 95.5 "The Fish" in Cleveland is already running the ad featuring former Democratic Congressman Tony Hall of Dayton and words from the 25th chapter of Matthew. (Listen to ad)


Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The Earth Pollutes Itself.

Given the Post Below this one, regarding granting nature human rights, can we prosecute nature for violating my human rights by polluting the earth? Just wondering.

Arctic 'methane chimneys' raise fears of runaway climate change

Researchers say evidence suggests that the frozen seabed is perforated and is starting to leak methane, but other scientists urge caution

Scientists claim to have discovered evidence for large releases of methane into the atmosphere from frozen seabed stores off the northern coast of Siberia.

A large injection of the gas - which is 21 times more potent as an atmospheric heat trap than carbon dioxide - has long been cited by climate scientists as the potential trigger for runaway global warming. The warming caused by the gas could destabilise permafrost further, they fear, leading to yet more methane release.

But climate experts have expressed caution at the claims, which have yet to be published in a peer reviewed scientific journal. Methane release from stores of so-called gas hydrates, that can form on land or under the sea, is not new to researchers. Huge quantities are known to exist in the Arctic, but special circumstances would need to exist for significant releases to occur.

"Methane release has been known for a number of years now," said geologist Dr Lorenz Schwark at the University of Cologne, Germany. "There are various areas around the world that have been studied in detail."

He said the process of methane release from hydrates had been filmed by robotic vehicles off the coast of Vancouver Island in Canada, for example.

"The problem is that in the Russian or in the Siberian Arctic on land and in the sea there is very little coverage by hard data and there are hardly any measurements. And therefore there is a lot of speculation going on."

In most cases, methane released from the sea bed is consumed by micro-organisms as it bubbles up to the surface. But if it is released quickly enough it could make it into the atmosphere.

"The most likely process where this happens - and there is geological evidence that it has happened in the past - is when the methane gas hydrate layer in the sediment destabilises on a slope. And then we have a slope failure, a landslide underwater," Dr Schwark said.

"As long as the scientists in the Siberian Arctic are not able to report very strong increases in submarine landslides and slope failures, I wouldn't expect that the release into the atmosphere is so severe that it is really very serious at the moment," Schwark added.

The scientists who have studied methane levels along Russia's northern coastline are aboard the Russian research ship Jacob Smirnitskyi.

Örjan Gustafsson of Stockholm University in Sweden told the Independent newspaper in an email from the vessel: "An extensive area of intense methane release was found. At earlier sites we had found elevated levels of dissolved methane.

"Yesterday, for the first time, we documented a field where the release was so intense that the methane did not have time to dissolve into the seawater but was rising as methane bubbles to the sea surface. These 'methane chimneys' were documented on echo sounder and with seismic [instrument]."

At some locations he said concentrations of the gas were 100 times the background level. These anomalies were documented in the East Siberian Sea and the Laptev Sea, covering several tens of thousands of square kilometres.

Gustafsson added: "The conventional thought has been that the permafrost 'lid' on the sub-sea sediments on the Siberian shelf should cap and hold the massive reservoirs of shallow methane deposits in place.

"The growing evidence for release of methane in this inaccessible region may suggest that the permafrost lid is starting to get perforated and thus leaking methane."

Estimates for the amount of carbon locked up in the hydrates vary from 500 to 5000 gigatonnes. Scientists predict that warming will release some of these deposits, but modelling the temperature rise that would trigger significant releases has proved extremely difficult.


Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

"Ecuador constitution would grant inalienable rights to nature"

Heard about this on Rush today. Posted below are some details. What is most important is Rush's comment about the reason for stupid stuff like this. He said, and I'm paraphrasing, the reason for this is the left's rejection of God. He is 100% correct. People, even Atheists, who reject the idea that there is one God who created this world, need to fill the hole in their soul with something else to worship. In this case it's planet earth. From Rush and www.worldproutassembly.org

The concept that nature itself can possess rights runs counter to the classical liberal theories of government that hold sway throughout much of the West, which view rights as possessed only by individual human beings. But Ecuador is not the first country to propose granting rights to nonhuman entities: Many countries, including the United States, have long held that corporations possess many of the same rights - such as the rights to free expression and to due process - that human beings have. And in June, Spain's parliament approved a measure to extend some human rights to nonhuman apes. - Eoin O'Carroll


By Eoin O'Carroll
09.03.08

Ecuador's proposed constitution includes an article that grants nature the right to "exist, persist, maintain and regenerate its vital cycles, structure, functions and its processes in evolution" and will grant legal standing to any person to defend those rights in court.
Voters will get to decide on Sept. 28 whether to adopt the new constitution, which would allow the president to run for reelection, to dissolve Congress, and to exert great control over the country's central bank. According to Reuters, 56 percent of Ecuadorans approve of the proposed document.

The blog Green Change quotes the five articles that acknowledge rights said to be possessed by nature, or "Pachamama," a goddess revered by indigenous Andean peoples whose name roughly translates into "Mother Earth."

Chapter: Rights for Nature

Art. 1. Nature or Pachamama, where life is reproduced and exists, has the right to exist, persist, maintain and regenerate its vital cycles, structure, functions and its processes in evolution.

Every person, people, community or nationality, will be able to demand the recognitions of rights for nature before the public organisms. The application and interpretation of these rights will follow the related principles established in the Constitution.

Art. 2. Nature has the right to an integral restoration. This integral restoration is independent of the obligation on natural and juridical persons or the State to indemnify the people and the collectives that depend on the natural systems.

In the cases of severe or permanent environmental impact, including the ones caused by the exploitation on non renewable natural resources, the State will establish the most efficient mechanisms for the restoration, and will adopt the adequate measures to eliminate or mitigate the harmful environmental consequences.

Art. 3. The State will motivate natural and juridical persons as well as collectives to protect nature; it will promote respect towards all the elements that form an ecosystem.

Art. 4. The State will apply precaution and restriction measures in all the activities that can lead to the extinction of species, the destruction of the ecosystems or the permanent alteration of the natural cycles.

The introduction of organisms and organic and inorganic material that can alter in a definitive way the national genetic patrimony is prohibited.

Art. 5. The persons, people, communities and nationalities will have the right to benefit from the environment and form natural wealth that will allow wellbeing.
The environmental services are cannot be appropriated; its production, provision, use and exploitation, will be regulated by the State.

The concept that nature itself can possess rights runs counter to the classical liberal theories of government that hold sway throughout much of the West, which view rights as possessed only by individual human beings. But Ecuador is not the first country to propose granting rights to nonhuman entities: Many countries, including the United States, have long held that corporations possess many of the same rights - such as the rights to free expression and to due process - that human beings have. And in June, Spain's parliament approved a measure to extend some human rights to nonhuman apes.

But, as an editorial in the Los Angeles Times observes, Ecuador's extension of rights to nature may represent a larger shift in how humans view their place in the world:

No other country has gone as far as Ecuador in proposing to give trees their day in court, but it certainly is not alone in its recalibration of natural rights. Religious leaders, including the Archbishop of Canterbury, the Dalai Lama and the Archbishop of Constantinople, have declared that caring for the environment is a spiritual duty. And earlier this year, the Catholic Church updated its list of deadly sins to include polluting the environment.

Ecuador is codifying this shift in sensibility. In some ways, this makes sense for a country whose cultural identity is almost indistinguishable from its regional geography - the Galapagos, the Amazon, the Sierra. How this new area of constitutional law will work, however, is another question. We aren't ready to endorse such a step at home, or even abroad. But it's intriguing. We'll be watching Ecuador's example.



Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Ok All Your Iranian Apologists Take This."EU warns Iran close to nuclear arms capacity:"

By GEORGE JAHN Associated Press
Published: Wednesday, September 24, 2008 at 11:39 a.m.
Last Modified: Wednesday, September 24, 2008 at 11:39 a.m.
VIENNA, Austria -

Iran is nearing the ability to arm a nuclear warhead even if it insists its atomic activities are peaceful, the European Union warned Wednesday.

In comments prepared for delivery to the International Atomic Energy Agency's 35 board members, the EU also asserted that Iran appeared to have had a past nuclear arms program despite its denials.

The statement was made available to reporters as the meeting turned its attention on Iran's nuclear defiance on its third day. The main international concerns focus on the country's refusal to freeze uranium enrichment despite three U.N. Security Council sanctions and its blocking of IAEA attempts to follow up on intelligence suggesting it was developing a nuclear arms program until several years ago.

Iran insists its nuclear activities are geared only toward generating power. But Israel says the Islamic Republic could have enough nuclear material to make its first bomb within a year. The U.S. estimates Iran is at least two years away from that stage, and some experts say the country could reach that stage in as little as 6 months through uranium enrichment.

An IAEA report drawn up for Wednesday's meeting says Iran has increased the number of centrifuges used to process uranium to nearly 4,000 from 3,000 just a few months ago.

But David Albright, whose Washington-based Institute for Science and International Security closely tracks suspect secret proliferators, has also been able to extrapolate other information from the report that is less obvious but of at least equal concern.

Iran, he says, has managed to iron out most of the bugs in the intensely complicated process of enrichment that often saw the centrifuges breaking down. The machines, he says "now appear to be running at approximately 85 percent of their stated target capacity, a significant increase over previous rates."

That, he says means, they can produce more enriched uranium faster. And while the IAEA says the machines have spewed out only low-enriched material suitable solely for nuclear fuel, producing enough of that can make it easy to "break out" quickly by reprocessing it to weapons-grade uranium.

To date, Iran has produced nearly 1,000 pounds of low-enriched uranium, said the report - close to what Albright says is the 1,500-pound minimum needed to produce the 45-60 pounds needed for a simple nuclear bomb under optimal conditions.

And with Iran's centrifuges running ever more smoothly, it "is progressing toward this capability and can be expected to reach it in six months to two years," says Albright.

Touching on such fears, the statement by the 27-nation EU said that Iran's defiance of Security Council demands on enrichment is troubling "because it brings us closer to the moment where Iran will have fissile materials for a weapon, if it chose to increase their degree of enrichment."

It also cast serious doubt on Iranian assertions that it never embarked on studies geared toward making nuclear weapons.

While the evidence "remains to be verified, the IAEA's exhaustive and detailed" information, "leads one to think that the Iran has methodically pursued a program aimed at acquiring the nuclear bomb," the statement said.

In a statement, Iran's mission to the IAEA again denied wrongdoing and suggested the pressure was part of a U.S. witchhunt.

The Islamic Republic "has repeatedly declared that there is not and has not been any undeclared nuclear activities and material in Iran," it said, denouncing the "fabricated and baseless allegations ... produced by the United States."

An IAEA report circulated to the board members Monday that faulted Iran for blocking efforts to further investigate the alleged weapons program.

Part of the report touched on what appeared to be drawings and calculations by Iranian engineers on reconfiguring its Shahab-3 missile to be able to carry a nuclear payload. Iranian officials say the missile has a range of 1,250 miles - enabling a strike on Israel and most of the Middle East.

Gregory L. Schulte, Washington's chief IAEA delegate, noted that - beyond dismissing the allegations - Iran "refuses to provide credible explanations to support its claims that all of this information ... is pure forgery and fabrication."

And his German counterpart, Ruediger Luedeking, said that "if Iran is not pursuing a military nuclear program it should have no difficulty in cooperating with the agency.

"Iran needs to explain why its military is so deeply involved in its nuclear program," he said.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

"Obama effigy found hanging on Ore. campus"

Found On www.newschief.com Wow, even in the lefty strong hold of Oregon they hate him. Don' worry though Bush will be blame.

Obama effigy found hanging on Ore. campus

The Associated Press
Published: Wednesday, September 24, 2008 at 12:06 p.m.
Last Modified: Wednesday, September 24, 2008 at 12:06 p.m.
NEWBERG, Ore. -

Officials of a Christian university say a life-size effigy of Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama was hung from a tree on the campus.

George Fox University President Robin Baker says a custodian discovered the cardboard cutout of Obama early Tuesday at the Oregon school and removed it.

The effigy was accompanied by a message targeting participants of a minority student scholarship program called Act Six.

It read, "Act Six reject."

Baker says he met with the students in the Act Six program, who receive full scholarships, late Tuesday and plans to address the school's student body Wednesday.



Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Obama Trys To Flip The Bitter Clingers To Vote For Him.

Pipe Dream Alert.

Obama out to flip Indiana to Dems

By TOM DAVIES Associated Press Writer
Published: Wednesday, September 24, 2008 at 10:23 a.m.
Last Modified: Wednesday, September 24, 2008 at 10:23 a.m.
INDIANAPOLIS -

Democrats typically skip right over reliably Republican Indiana when plotting presidential campaign strategy.

In this Sept. 21, 2007 file photo, Republican presidential hopeful Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., center, accompanied by former Indianan Sen. Dan Coats, left, and Indiana Attorney General Steve Carter, meets with reporters in Indianapolis. Democrats typically skip right over reliably Republican Indiana when plotting presidential campaign strategy. Barack Obama is bidding to flip the state into the Democratic column this year. (AP Photo/AJ Mast, File)

Not Barack Obama.

The candidate from next-door Illinois is bidding to flip the state into the Democratic column this year.

To that end, he is doing what no presidential candidate has done in decades - spending significant amounts of money and time in the state, while Republican John McCain maintains a low profile.

Obama narrowly lost the May primary here to Hillary Rodham Clinton. And in the process, he had "the opportunity to at least define himself with Hoosier voters and that has lingered," said Kip Tew, a former state Democratic chairman who is a volunteer adviser to the Obama campaign. "They competed with a ground game that no one's ever seen in the state."

Indiana, with 11 electoral votes, is one of only a handful of states where Obama's advertising has been unanswered by McCain. The Democrat has 32 offices across the state and dozens of paid staffers. His campaign spent about $6 million on television advertising in Indiana leading up to the May primary and has aired at least $1.5 million in TV ads since June.

Obama has made five stops in the state since mid-July, and running mate Joe Biden was returning to the state Wednesday.

The McCain campaign, by contrast, is nearly invisible. It has no field offices or paid staffers working full-time in the state, and McCain hasn't visited the state since July 1. Republicans were expected to respond to Obama's ad presence in the state with ads of their own later this week.

Both candidates know history is not on Obama's side: For more than a generation, Indiana has been colored in for the GOP nominee soon after polls start closing. George W. Bush won with 60 percent in 2004 and 57 percent in 2000, and the state last went Democratic in the 1964 Lyndon Johnson landslide.

But Jessie Bochert, 45, who runs a business preparing houses for sale from her home in Granger, shows why Obama thinks he may have an opening in the state. Bochert, who voted for Bush in 2000 and 2004, initially supported McCain but switched to Obama and began volunteering for his campaign.

"I feel guilty for all that has happened" under Bush, she said. "There are so many people I talk to, they can't afford their prescriptions, they don't know what to pay, they can't afford anything. It's really the economy, and that's what it's coming down to."

Republican Tim Surber said he believes McCain appeals to Indiana voters because of his military background and his push for more offshore oil drilling. Surber, 49, who runs a computer consulting office in Indianapolis, thinks McCain got a big boost among Indiana conservatives when he chose Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin as his running mate.

Still, he worries about the McCain campaign's low-key approach.

"I know they feel like it's a state they're going to win," he said. "I really wish Palin would come in, I wish McCain would come in. ... They need to at least let us know that they know we're out here."

Public polls taken this month show the two candidates running about even or McCain slightly ahead.

Republicans say the numbers reflect the state's conservative-leaning voters and validate their approach, which involves working through state and county-level organizations to build support for McCain.

"Given the millions of dollars and months of staff time that Senator Obama has spent here, you question whether or not he ought to be doing a little better," said Luke Messer, the co-chairman of McCain's Indiana campaign and a former state GOP executive director. "They were polling in May at 43, 44 percent and that's essentially where they remain."

But Democrats are buoyed by how close the race is. They note that three incumbent Republican congressmen lost re-election bids two years ago, and say the state's struggling economy makes voters more receptive to Obama. The state's unemployment rate hit 6.4 percent in August, up nearly 2 percentage points from a year earlier.

An increase of more than 425,000 new voter registrations since the 2006 election, and Obama's name recognition in northwestern Indiana, a heavily Democratic area where more than 10 percent of the state's voters see Chicago TV stations, also could help.

But to win Indiana, Obama also must consolidate the support of Democrats in rural areas and the blue-collar factory towns that strongly backed Clinton in May.

Messer, the McCain campaign's state leader, said Obama faces an uphill fight in many parts of the state where Republicans are well organized. Several Obama campaign offices are in counties where most Republicans are unopposed in local races on the election ballot. No Democrat other than Sen. Evan Bayh has won a statewide race since 2000.

"We're more interested in winning an election than putting on a show," Messer said.

Tew, the Obama adviser, said it would take a significant strategy shift for McCain to more actively campaign in the state.

"If they start to compete in Indiana then it's an admission that there's another state in play that they didn't think was ever going to be in play," Tew said. "If they don't compete in Indiana, then they're in danger of losing it. So they're in a box."



Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Queenb Sent This To Me From Her Bunker Deep In The Heart Of Montana.

Chicago Information
 
 
Body count. In the last six months 292 killed (murdered) in Chicago, 221 killed in Iraq. 

Sens. Barack Obama & Dick Durbin, Rep. Jesse Jackson Jr., Gov. Rod Blogojevich, House leader Mike Madigan, Atty. Gen. Lisa Madigan, Mayor Richard Daley.....our leadership in Illinois.....all Democrats.  Thank you for the combat zone in Chicago.   Of course they're all blaming each other.   Can't blame Republicans, they're aren't any! 

State pension fund $44 Billion in debt, worst in country.   Cook County (Chicago) sales tax 10.25% highest in country. (Look'em up if you want). Chicago school system one of the worst in country. This is the political culture that Obama comes from in Illinois.   He's gonna "fix" Washington politics?
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

"Co-ed dorms for gender-confused males?"

We already have laws like this in Colorado. It is legal for people, who because of some delusion believe they are the wrong sex, to use any bathroom they want. All some degenerate or Pedophile has to do is tell the police, after being caught in the woman's bathroom, that they are really a woman in a man’s body. And the police can do nothing about it. It's now legal in Colorado for them to be there. Now the University of Pittsburgh wants to go a step farther. Here is the story from www.onenewsnow.com.

The University of Pittsburgh is changing its anti-discrimination policy to include gender identity.

The new policy means that a man who feels like he is a woman can be housed in the women's dormitory and vice versa. And that involves "showering and using the restroom and the whole shebang," explains Diane Gramley, president of American Family Association of Pennsylvania (AFA of PA).
 
Gramley mentally puts herself in the position of being in a women's dorm restroom, when a man walks in to use the facilities. "I think that she would be shocked and dismayed -- and I would think she would also be concerned about her safety," she contends.
 
The family advocate says it is conceivable that a man could convince university officials of his gender confusion and gain access to the women's dorm to search for prey. Gramley also notes the university should be concerned about potential lawsuits from "concerned parents and students."

Gramley believes school officials are pandering to a small group and ignoring the best interests of the majority. "They're bowing down. They're doing the politically correct thing and putting their entire student body at risk by doing this," she adds. "They're bowing down to the pressure from a very small group of students, and they're just not considering the full impact of the policy change. Why can't the institutions of higher education stay within their academic goals and not seek to be agents of political correctness?" she wonders.

Gramley has lodged a protest with University of Pittsburgh officials and believes parents who are paying the high tuition for their youngsters ought to do the same.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (1) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Another Pipe Dream: "'Islamists edge towards democracy"

Before you read the article here is what I think. The only reason radicals Islamist participate in the democratic process is they know violence, at this point, will not further their purpose. That purpose is to be in control. In control of what you say? In control of everything that's what. They believe it is their duty to bring the world under the rule of Allah and Islam. The will spread Islam by any means nessasary. If voilence is the most expedient way then so be it. If democray is the way then that just fine with them. In this case, using the pretense of participating in the democratic process serves two ends. One, to pack the government with duly elected Muslims who will press for greater and great laws that are in line with Sharia law. Second to lull the sheeple in this world into believeing that the Muslims want to play nice and get along with the rest of the world. Just like in the Kenny Rogers song, they know when to hold them and they know when to fold them. The only exception is they will never walk away.

Islamists edge towards democracy'

Radio Netherlands, Netherlands September 23 2008
By Michel Hoebink*

Islamic political movements in the Middle East and Asia are becoming increasingly democratic. That is the conclusion reached at a conference on 'post-Islamism' in Leiden. But not everyone is prepared to simply trust the Islamists now that they are talking democracy.

It is a striking paradox. Countries such as the United States are becoming less keen on the notion of democratisation in the Islamic world, amid fears that elections would only bring the Islamists to power. Meanwhile, the Islamists themselves are viewing democracy with increasing enthusiasm.

Less radical
Throughout the Islamic world - from Morocco to Indonesia - it is becoming more common for Islamic political movements to take part in the democratic process, becoming less radical in their views as a result. Asef Bayat, director of Leiden's International Institute for the Study of Islam in the Modern World (ISIM), refers to this trend as 'post-Islamism'. "Islam remains an important source of inspiration for these movements but religion is seen less and less as being in conflict with modern ideals of democracy and human rights."

Two years ago, the Netherlands Scientific Council for Government Policy (WRR) published a report in which it pointed out this development and advised the Dutch government to initiate a dialogue with moderate Islamic political movements. The report did not have much in the way of impact: the Netherlands still refuses to have any contact with movements such as Hezbollah and Hamas.

Turkey
A country at the forefront of this trend towards democratic Islamism is Turkey, where the ruling AK Party seems to have developed into something like an Islamic counterpart to the Christian Democratic parties of Europe. "The AK Party has even begun to praise secularism", explains researcher Ihsan Dagi of the Middle East Technical University in Ankara. "The Turkish state believes in a radical form of (...)

*RNW translation (dd)

The only reason radicals Islamist participate in the democratic process it because they know violence at this point will not further their purpose. That purpose is to be in control. In control of what you say? In control of everything that's what. They believe it is their duty to bring the world under the rule of Allah and Islam. The will spread Islam by any means nessasary. If voilence is the most expedient way then so be it. If democray is the way then that just fine with them. In this case using the pretense of participating in the democratic process serves two ends. One to pack what ever government there is with duly elected Muslims who will press for greater and great laws that are in line with Sharia law. And to lull the sheeple in this world into believeing that the Muslims want to play nice and get along with the rest of the world. Just like in the Kenny Rogers song, they know when to hold them and they know when to fold up. The only exception is they will never walk away.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Seaman Worth 900,000 Because Of Trojan Discharge.

Ok I thought it was funny. Found on www.earthtimes.org

Manila - The United States on Tuesday presented rewards totalling 900,000 dollars to 12 Filipino seamen who helped successfully prosecute polluters of US waters. A US embassy statement said the 12 sailors were crewmen of the Italian bulk carrier MV Windsor Castle and the Danish carrier MT Clipper Trojan, which discharged waste oil into US waters in 2006 and 2007. The statement said that as a result of the seamen's testimonies, the owners of the two cargo vessels were found guilty of polluting the ocean and were fined. The rewards, which ranged from 25,000 to 175,000 dollars, were presented during a ceremony at the US embassy in Manila.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Time For The Obama Theme Song

Telling Stories.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Man They Keep Letting That Cat Out Of The Bag.

Note the re-writing of history using "mathematical logic" Amazing I did not know you could use mathematics to excuse Pedophelia. Found this on www.alarabiya.ne.

muslims marry young.
Moroccan scholars outraged at fatwa
Salafi preacher says girls can marry at 9
Scholars question whether girls should be allowed to marry before puberty (file)

RABAT (Hassan Al-Ashraf)

Morocco’s Supreme Scientific Council condemned a fatwa issued by a Salafi preacher that permits girls to marry at the age of nine. The council filed a complaint with the Rabat preliminary court, which has opened an investigation.

The Council said in a statement Sunday that the fatwa issued by Sheikh Mohamed al-Maghrawi has no religious validity since its reasoning is based on only one individual case—the marriage of Prophet Mohamed to Aisha bint Abu-Bakr, who most Muslims believe was nine-years-old, in the 7th century.

"This is an exceptional case related only to the prophet and cannot be applied to the rest of the people," said the Council.

The Council said that it is the only body authorized to issue fatwas and not any individual preachers or scholars, adding that Maghrawi’s fatwa "uses religion to support perverted views."

Saudi researcher and historian Dr. Suhayla Zein al-Abedin

Earlier this month, Saudi researcher and historian Dr. Suhayla Zein al-Abedin said that her research indicates that Aisha likely married the prophet when she was 19 and not nine. She based her conclusions on an analysis of the historical record and mathematical logic and said she is still verifying her results.

Nabila al-Tibr, head of the National Association for Solidarity with Women told AlArabiya.net that such a fatwa encourages sexual delinquency and compels children to think about sexual relations at such an early age.

Tibr added that the Association played a very significant role in issuing the law that raises the age of marriage for girls to 18 so that she can be mature enough to bear the responsibilities of marriage.

"How can a fatwa say that a girl can get married before puberty while we are exerting out utmost effort to stop marriages between the age of 15 and 18 in some Moroccan regions," added Tibr.

"If the Sheikh has a daughter at that age, why doesn't he marry her off?"

Sheikh Maghrawi is one of the most renowned Salafi figures in Morocco. He issued the fatwa in response to a question about the validity of marriage for girls before puberty.

Abedin, a member of the World Union of Muslim Scholars, appealed to the Saudi Minister of Justice to consider preventing cases of child marriage, given the magnitude of potential psychological and physical pain, and setting a minimum marriage age.

Other researchers have noted that there are many explanations for why Ayesha’s age – and that of the prophet or his other wives – cannot be definitely determined including high illiteracy at the time, typographical errors, and simple exaggeration as stories were repeated through the years.


(Translated from Arabic by Sonia Farid)

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive